Global sham democracy

                            Global Sham Democracy is a systems-based analysis of modern political order—and a direct challenge to one of the most common assumptions of our time: that representative democracy automatically equals popular sovereignty. The book asks a precise, verifiable question: do today’s democratic procedures actually enable the people to rule, or do they primarily symbolize that rule while real decision-making power is structurally concentrated elsewhere?

Dominik Mikulaschek approaches democracy neither as a moral ideal nor as a political camp, but as a functional concept: a technical method for organizing collective decision-making under the condition of popular sovereignty. To examine this scientifically, the book separates normative expectations (“what democracy should be”) from functional reality (“how decision-making systems operate and what outcomes their architecture produces”). Democracy is treated as a measurable system—evaluated through criteria such as decision-making authority, feedback loops, reversibility, transparency, accountability, and error-correction capacity.

From this benchmark, the book develops its central thesis: representation is not simply a democratic tool—it is a systemic rupture. Representative systems transfer power upward through institutional filters that tend to disconnect citizens’ will from the actual exercise of authority. This disconnection is not framed as the moral failure of politicians or voters, but as a rational consequence of system design. If feedback is interrupted, public trust erodes; if correction mechanisms are weak, frustration grows; and if legitimacy becomes symbolic, radicalization becomes structurally likely.

Step by step, the book traces how power concentrates through party structures, how political dependence forms through economic influence, and how legitimacy is maintained through media narratives and narrative management. It explains why “the common good” often fails to emerge—not because citizens lack virtue, but because the system’s architecture rewards strategic power accumulation over collective correction.

To clarify what democracy would minimally require to function, the book uses direct democracy as a reference model—not as an idealized utopia, but as an analytical benchmark for comparing political effectiveness and citizen control. From there, the argument expands to the global level: in a world where key decisions increasingly occur beyond nation-states, democracy cannot remain a purely national project. The book identifies a growing global democratic deficit and argues that democratic scrutiny must extend to the international sphere where power now operates.

In response, Global Sham Democracy proposes an institutional framework for a Democratic World Parliament—a blueprint for global popular sovereignty that addresses design principles, feasibility, transition paths, risks, limitations, and counterarguments. The conclusion confronts a final fork in the road: democracy as a learning, self-correcting system—or politics as administration under democratic symbolism.

This book is written for readers who want to understand political systems with engineering-level clarity: politically interested citizens, analysts, students, and decision-makers—anyone who suspects that the crisis of democracy is not merely cultural or psychological, but structural.